With reference to Mughal India, what is/are the difference/differences between Jagirdar and Zamindar? 1. Jagirdars were holders of land assignments in lieu of judicial and police duties, whereas Zamindars were holders of revenue rights without obligation to perform any duty other than revenue collection. 2. Land assignments to Jagirdars were hereditary and revenue rights of Zamindars were not hereditary. Select the correct answer using the code given below.

1. In Mughal India, Jagirdars were primarily Mansabdars (military/administrative officials) who were granted land assignments (jagirs) in lieu of cash salaries, not specifically for judicial and police duties. Their main responsibility was maintaining troops. 2. Zamindars held hereditary rights over land and were responsible for revenue collection, but they often had other obligations and performed certain state duties at the local level, contrary to the claim they had no obligation other than revenue collection. Statement 1 is therefore incorrect. 3. Land assignments to Jagirdars (jagirs) were generally *not* hereditary; they were transferable and held at the Emperor's pleasure. 4. The revenue rights of Zamindars were generally hereditary. Statement 2 incorrectly states the opposite for both. 5. Therefore, both statements are incorrect.